Comments on: Keys to OKR Success: A Q&A with the Man Who Introduced OKRs to Google, John Doerr https://www.betterworks.com/magazine/keys-okr-success-qa-john-doerr/ HR software to align and develop your workforce Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:10:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Mark Thompson https://www.betterworks.com/magazine/keys-okr-success-qa-john-doerr/#comment-5 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:35:00 +0000 https://betterworks.wpengine.com/?p=317#comment-5 Great discussion! Not all goals are created equal, and BetterWorks’ tool helps clarify what matters most

]]>
By: Mihai Ionescu https://www.betterworks.com/magazine/keys-okr-success-qa-john-doerr/#comment-4 Mon, 04 May 2015 09:09:00 +0000 https://betterworks.wpengine.com/?p=317#comment-4 MBO has been for many years on the down slope because individual objectives, used mainly for performance evaluation purposes, were hard to aggregate to company level, just because the linkage with the company objectives wasn’t set, in the first place. As Peter Drucker, the parent of MBO in the 1950’s, said twenty years later ‘Management by objectives works if you know the objectives: 90% of the time you don’t.’

OKR does two things to correct this: First of all, it introduces a fast pace of at least quarterly setting of individual-level objectives, measuring progress through KRs and setting priorities around tasks to be done. Secondly, it aligns the individual objectives (or even KRs and tasks) to their team’s or department’s Objectives, KPI & KRI Measures and Strategic Initiatives, braking away from the employee performance evaluation cycle. But take care with setting the OKR objectives through ‘negotiation’ – that’s what killed MBO!

But the major problem of MBO remains, as the OKR needs to become fully embedded within the causal mechanism that correlates company objectives. And that is best done using Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Try to set OKR apart from BSC and you might expose OKR to a fate similar to that of MBO. At Google or anywhere else.
.

]]>